QA teams drowning in backlog
Current dragRegression smoke is trapped behind engineering tickets.
Testorim moveTurn repeated release checks into saved procedures.
No code required— describe what should happen. Testorim spins up Chromium, drives it like a real user, captures everything, and writes up what actually happened — video, trace, accessibility scan, console errors, the lot.
No DSL, no test framework, no selectors. You write what you'd tell a new hire on day one. Testorim's planner picks the right Playwright primitives, finds elements with cascading strategies, and self-heals when the page changes.
Not a headless DOM simulator. Tests run in the same engine your users see — with a real cookie jar, real CORS, real navigations. Cross-browser to Firefox + Safari for the bugs Chromium hides.
Every run finishes with an AI summary that quotes specific failures, plus the artifacts to back it up. One click and you have a Jira-ready ticket with reproduction steps, expected vs actual, and links to the video and trace.
Failed — the checkout button rendered but the POST /api/orders silently 500'd. UI showed the success page, but no order row was created.
The /api/orders handler at backend/src/routes/orders.ts:42 is throwing on a missing Stripe customer id. Add a null check and return 4xx instead of 500.
Both produce a passing run, a video, and a report. One of them you can write while you're half-asleep.
import { test, expect } from "@playwright/test";
test("user can sign in", async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto("https://your-app.com/login");
await page
.getByRole("textbox", { name: /email/i })
.fill("test@example.com");
await page.getByRole("button", { name: /^continue$/i }).click();
await page
.getByRole("textbox", { name: /password/i })
.fill(process.env.PASSWORD!);
await page.getByRole("button", { name: /^continue$/i }).click();
await expect(page).toHaveURL(/\/dashboard/);
await expect(
page.getByRole("heading", { name: /welcome/i })
).toBeVisible();
});"Sign in with test@example.com and verify the dashboard loads."
The chat input is the input. Anything between a one-line smoke test and a fifteen-step checkout walkthrough — Testorim's planner figures out the steps. No DSL, no selectors, no "wait for..." gymnastics.
"Go to /login, sign in with test@example.com, verify the dashboard loads."
Steps stream onto your screen as they execute. Screenshots refresh twice a second. If something fails, the agent stops cleanly — no zombie cursor flailing through three more steps after the page already broke.
Loved the run? One click and it becomes a saved procedure that replays without invoking the LLM — paid plans pay cents per re-run. Hated it? Walk away. Nothing was saved.
Testorim is not trying to replace test engineers. It is for teams whose first problem is coverage throughput: too many important flows, not enough automation time.
Current dragRegression smoke is trapped behind engineering tickets.
Testorim moveTurn repeated release checks into saved procedures.
Current dragLaunch confidence depends on someone manually clicking the app.
Testorim moveDescribe the path once, then replay it before every launch.
Current dragYou want speed now without giving up code ownership later.
Testorim moveUse no-code for discovery, export important flows to Playwright.
What should we check?
Describe a user flow. The agent plans and executes it.
navigate /login
type email field
click Pay $49
assert receipt
Checkout receipt loads after payment.
Three concrete commitments, not vague reassurances. Each one is backed by how the system is actually built — and the third has the encryption keys to prove it.
Tests, instructions, screenshots, network captures — none of it goes into a training set. Not ours, not the model providers' (we're on enterprise API tiers with training off). What you run today doesn't shape what anyone else sees tomorrow.
Test data lives inside your workspace, scoped to your organization at the database level. We don't sell to third parties, syndicate aggregate data, or grant any human at our company access without a support ticket from you and a clear reason.
Login storage state, environment cookies, database credentials, and Slack bot tokens are AES-256-GCM encrypted before they touch the database. Even if our database was compromised tomorrow, the keys to your apps wouldn't be.
No-code QA means you define test intent without writing test code. In Testorim, that means plain-English instructions; the system translates them into browser actions, runs them in Chromium, and returns evidence.
No. Record-playback usually replays brittle click coordinates or selectors. Testorim resolves targets from labels, roles, placeholders, and text with fallback strategies, so tests survive normal UI drift better.
Yes. Teams often use Testorim for fast coverage and then export procedures as standalone Playwright specs when they want code-level ownership in CI.
Yes. Multi-step auth forms, dynamic pages, and long-running operations are supported. Reports include the exact run evidence so failures are reproducible.
No. It removes repetitive scripting work so QA and product teams can spend more time on test strategy, risk analysis, and release quality decisions.
A report plus artifacts: step log, screenshots, video, Playwright trace, console errors, network events, and accessibility findings when available.
30 runs a month at $0 is enough to know if this fits. Then a flat monthly tier, plus one-time credit packs for a busy week. Every plan is cancel-anytime.
Try it on personal projects.
For solo builders shipping fast.
For teams that ship together.
Sign up, paste a URL, describe a flow. First report in under two minutes. No credit card.
Start free